Automatic language translation
Our website uses an automatic service to translate our content into different languages. These translations should be used as a guide only. See our Accessibility page for further information.
From 1 December 2020
14 April 2014: Email procedures (PDF, 21.0 KB) are to be followed when submitting consent orders or for general email correspondence for matters listed before the District Court of NSW including the List Judge and the Judicial Registrar.
8 March 2012: An increasing number of settlement consent documents are being rejected by the Court. This results in delay, further cost and sometimes unnecessary court appearances. A checklist has been prepared to clarify the process of applying for a consent judgment.
7 December 2011: The Work Health and Safety Act 2011 commences on 1 January 2012.
Section 229B(1) of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 provides that, except as provided by this section, proceedings for an offence against the Act or the regulations are to dealt with summarily before the Local Court or before the District Court in its summary jurisdiction.
Attention is drawn to the following matters that are relevant to summary prosecutions before the District Court:
17 May 2011: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 36.1A (1) provides that a court may give judgment, or order that judgment be entered, in terms of an agreement between parties. Unless there is a particular reason that a verdict is required that is clearly stated in the agreement, parties are requested not to seek a 'verdict' but rather a 'judgment' when preparing terms of agreement (eg a consent judgment) under rule 36.1A
Judgment may be delayed if an order for a 'verdict' is sought because the registry must refer such matters to the judicial registrar or a judge to consider, as assistant registrars do not have authority to order a verdict.
Practitioners are also reminded that barristers do not have the authority to sign documents on behalf of a party (see UCPR 4.4). If counsel sign terms of agreement the terms may not be accepted by the court.
December 8 2011: Parties before the Sydney District Court often do not comply with the provisions of Civil Practice Note 1 in relation to both the preparation for hearing and the use of expert reports. This notice draws particular attention to the parts of Civil Practice Note 1 that will be strictly applied at future pre-trial hearings and status conferences:
1.2 Parties should expect to be allocated a trial date within 12 months of the commencement of proceedings and plan to meet this time standard.
2.1 Parties must not commence proceedings until they are ready to comply with the requirements of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (UCPR) and the court's practice notes for preparation and trial. This means that, except in special circumstances, the plaintiff's preparation for trial must be well advanced before filing the statement of claim.
5.7 The court will give directions for the service of expert reports under rule 31.19 UCPR at the pre-trial conference. The parties must be able to tell the court the precise nature of any expert evidence to be relied on and the names of all experts so that appropriate directions can be made. All reports must be served at least 28 days before the status conference.
8.2 Cases in the General List will be required to take a hearing date at the status conference even though there are still some matters to be completed before the hearing. Appropriate orders will be made.
NSW District Court
8 December 2011
26 May 2023
We acknowledge the traditional owners and custodians of the land on which we work and we pay respect to the Elders, past, present and future.